Opportunity for Resolution
The construction world we live in currently embodies one of hostile and adverse relations, little collaboration, and finger-pointing mentalities. When issues of design and construction occur, they appear too late for pro-active solutions. Innovative efforts are hampered by wasted time defending liability and the quality of a finished product deteriorates. Designers lack the experience of nuts and bolts construction; Constructors have no ability to give input on design, cost, schedule, etc…until it is too late in the project; and owners face a process whittled with unforeseen costs and a vague vision of their product. The architecture, engineering, and construction industry is a trying world that sometimes lacks professionalism and efficiency, but the world of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) could offer a solution this industry has been searching for.
West Village Commons did bring in a contractor early to help plan out the construction sequence and create an accurate estimate. But the relationship between the contractor and the architect is very strained. Victor Sanvido of Southland Industries told me during a conversation that the Architect does not understand the financial risk the contractor takes on, and the contractor does not understand the professional liability the architect takes on. The goals of both are not aligned and until they are, project communication and efficiency will not reach full potential. There needs to be a delivery system that unites the key members involved, the architect, contractor, and owner, and creates common goals for the entire project team.
Research Goal
This industry topic can be a daunting task to evaluate because it is hard to place a physical value on efficiency. Because this delivery system is quite new, it will be challenging to find quantifiable solutions. The goal of this research is create a delivery system that would have harnessed the full potential of communication, the benefit of bringing on a contractor at project inception, signing a single contract based on project goals, and utilizing the full potential of BIM technologies. I will also research possible solutions to IPD issues such as bonding and insurance problems and quantifying profit based on project goals. Finally I will compare and contrast the AIA sample IPD contract and the AGC’s Consensus contract; find the commonalities and research solutions to the differences. IPD will be the overarching theme for my entire Thesis project: How IPD could have made these analysis topics possible, and the cost benefit of using an integrated delivery system. |